01 November 2011

Firefighters, Residents Protest Cuts in San Miguel Fire District

Firefighters and residents protested reduced services Tuesday in one of San Diego County’s largest fire districts: San Miguel.

Fire Station 23 on Dehesa Road switched to reduced services Tuesday morning. Picketers were outside the station asking for the fire board's seven members to cut elsewhere.

The San Miguel Fire Board approved a plan to switch out a fire engine company for a medic rescue unit, despite criticism from firefighters and some residents.

“It's going to be huge because the amount of time a fire has the ability to grow in nature and get out of control,” said Kevin Clark from San Miguel's FireFighters Union. “We could be at the scene of a fire in four minutes and now you're looking at double or almost triple the time.”

The majority of calls in the area, 70 percent, are medical aid calls, according to the district.

Engine 23 was chosen because it has the lowest fire risk compared to its population and the lowest response volume within the district, according to the board.

The reduction in services will save the fire district about $300,000 over one year.

The board is trying to balance providing the same service with receiving less revenue from property taxes and higher personnel costs said Chief Auggie Ghio.

“We're going to make sure the public is safe. We’ve developed a plan where we’re going to respond in the same great response time,” Ghio said a board meeting last week.

However, some firefighters claim that’s not realistic and the response time is unacceptable.

“The rescue unit can be there within 5 to 7 minutes, our normal response times, however that secondary structural firefighting engine… is 8 to 12 minutes away,” Kevin Clark Local 1434 Vice President said in a recorded statement on the union’s website.

No jobs are being lost in this change.

Bank of America Cancels Debit Card Fee

Bank of America Cancels Debit Card Fee

In response to public outrage, Bank of America is canceling plans to impose a $5 monthly debit card fee.

The announcement came exactly a month after Bank of America announced what many customers were calling “the final straw”, a $5 monthly fee to customers who use their debit card for purchases.

Bank of America said its decision to drop its plans was based on customer feedback, according to a statement.

“We have listened to our customers very closely over the last few weeks and recognize their concern with our proposed debit usage fee,” said David Darnell, co-chief operating officer for Bank of America.

“Our customers’ voices are most important to us,” Darnell said.

“As a result, we are not currently charging the fee and will not be moving forward with any additional plans to do so.”

Bank of America cited "the changing economics of offering debit cards" as an explanation for its plan on Oct. 1.

But the explanation only added to the frustration some customers said they had been feeling toward big banks and corporate greed.

Just one example from the USA LOCAL NEWS Facebook page came from Debbie Hennessey, who posted her thoughts when we reported the story a month ago.

“Um, they can kiss my butt! I’ve been a customer for 30 years. They need to do better than that!”

Looks like Bank of America listened this time.

Follow USA LOCAL NEWS for the latest LA news, events and entertainment: Twitter: @USA LOCAL NEWS // Facebook: USA LOCAL NEWS

Texas Judges: Filing Period for Offices May Shorten

Texas Judges: Filing Period for Offices May Shorten

A three-judge federal panel says it's unlikely that they'll approve district maps to be used temporarily for next year's congressional primaries while legal challenges to Texas redistricting proceed.

Consequently, the filing period may be shortened for candidates in all state and congressional races by about two weeks.

The view was made clear during a Monday federal court hearing in San Antonio. The San Antonio Express-News reports the judges said they'll be unlikely to approve interim congressional maps by Nov. 12, when filing for statewide office begins.

The hearing involved a combination of several lawsuits filed by minority and Democratic groups. A final resolution is stalled while a Justice Department challenge to lines proposed by the state is pending before a three-judge panel in Washington.

Texas Family Sues Over Alleged Listeria Death

Texas Family Sues Over Alleged Listeria Death

A negligence lawsuit filed by the family of an elderly North Texas woman says she died after eating cantaloupe allegedly tainted with listeria.

The lawsuit filed in Dallas against Jensen Farms of Holly, Colo., said Marie Jones, 89, died Sept. 23 at a hospital after consuming

The Food and Drug Administration said Jensen Farms voluntarily recalled its whole cantaloupes Sept. 14. Federal health officials said dozens of deaths have been linked to the listeria outbreak in 12 states.

The lawsuit filed last week on behalf of the Dallas County woman's children, Russell Jones and Terri Blackmon, also names Frontera Produce Ltd. of Edinburg. A Frontera spokesman declined comment on the lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed by Dallas-based law firm Reyes Brown Reilley and Marler Clark, is the eighth lawsuit filed by Marler Clark in the multi-state listeria outbreak.

“In this day and age, people should not be hospitalized or die because of something they ate,” said Marler Clark Listeria lawyer William Marler. “Food producers and distributors have a responsibility to consumers to sell food that is unadulterated and free of foodborne pathogens such as Listeria – no exceptions.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have confirmed 133 illnesses and 28 deaths in a multi-state Listeria outbreak that has been linked to Colorado-based Jensen Farms. 

A message left Tuesday with Jensen Farms by The Associated Press was not immediately returned.

Judge Allowing Lululemon Slaying Victim’s Mother to Testify

Judge Allowing Lululemon Slaying Victim’s Mother to Testify

A judge ruled Tuesday that Lululemon slaying victim Jayna Murray’s mother will be allowed to testify for the prosecution in the trial of Brittany Norwood.

Norwood’s lawyer objected to allowing Phyllis Murray to testify about her daughter, saying it would be extremely prejudicial. Judge Robert Greenberg said the testimony is relevant.

The defense also objected to the prosecution playing a 3-hour-long police interview with Norwood, but Greenberg allowed that, too, saying prosecutors have to show her thinking that the murder was premeditated and deliberate.

"Premeditation is some type of deliberation,” legal analyst Barry Helfand said. “It can be brief. When I say brief, I mean very, very, very brief. A second, and that's deliberation."

Montgomery County police Officer David McGill testified Tuesday about bloody footprints that were tracked through the Bethesda Row Lululemon Athletica store made by two pairs of sneakers: a woman’s size 7-and-a-half New Balance and a man’s size 14 Reebok. The footprints were not made at the same time McGill concluded. The New Balance footprints made first and followed by the Reeboks suggested overlapping bloody shoe impressions.

Prosecutors contend Norwood used shoes kept in the store for alterations to make the tracks to support her story that there had been two masked assailants the night of March 11.

McGill also demonstrated how Norwood could tie herself up with a white plastic zip tie, which he tightened with his teeth.

Lead Detective James Drewery said he interviewed Norwood March 14 thinking she was a victim. She said the assailants took mail that had her address, so she feared for her life.

Days later he followed up with a long recorded interview. Her story started falling apart, he said, and she became a suspect in his mind.

Teacher's Union Files Another Suit Against Rahm's Board of Ed

Teacher's Union Files Another Suit Against Rahm's Board of Ed

The Chicago Teachers Union has filed suit against the Chicago Board of Education, claiming the board is illegally interviewing teacher applicants about their feelings about collective bargaining.

If the respondents do not provide satisfactory answers on the "TeacherFit" questionnaire, the suit alleges, they are not considered for employment. This is the second suit the Union has filed against the city in recent months.

This time the CTU says that's a clear violation of the Illinois Labor Relations Act because it amounts to "interrogating applicants about protected activity" which is "unlawful intimidation and coercion."

The questions include:

Question 20, sub question 4 asks the applicant to state how much he or she agrees with the statement, "I help people when they need it, even when that means risking confrontation."

Question 22, sub question 3 asks the applicant to state how much he or she agrees with the statement, "I love being a champion for my ideas, even against others' opposition."

Question 22, sub question 7 asks the applicant to state how much he or she agrees with the statement, "I love to challenge the status quo."

Question 27 asks the applicant how he or she would respond to being assigned work that takes away from class preparation and requires working over lunch breaks, evenings and weekends (a direct reference to longer school days.)

Question 30 asks the applicant how he or she would feel about a job that would require the applicant to regularly work after hours.

CTU and the Rahm Emanuel administration have engaged in a bitter fight over longer school days since Emanuel took office.

The Union recently won a court decision from the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board saying Emanuel went too far in coercing 13 Chicago Public Schools to accept longer school days -- a violation of the Union contract -- in exchange for incentives.

The most recent suit asks that the Chicago Board of Education cease and desist from asking the aforementioned questions on the TeacherFit application. Furthermore, the CTU would like applicants who were disqualified because of their TeacherFit answers admitted immediately.

Violence More Common Among Kids of Combat Veterans

Violence More Common Among Kids of Combat Veterans

A new study suggests that when parents are deployed in the military, their children are more than twice as likely to carry a weapon, join a gang or be involved in fights.

And that includes the daughters.

"This study raises serious concerns about an under-recognized consequence of war," said Sarah Reed, who led the research of military families in Washington state.

Last year, nearly 2 million U.S. children had at least one parent serving in the military. Deployment can hurt a family in a variety of ways. There's stress while that parent is overseas and in danger, as the remaining parent has to shoulder all responsibilities and family roles shift. There can also be challenges after deployed parents' return, especially if they were physically or psychologically damaged.

The effect of military deployment on kids is an emerging field of research. The new study is considered the first of its kind to focus on those affected by deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq. It's unique in that it looked at a statewide swath of the population in comparing the behavior of kids in military families to children in non-military families.

The study, to be presented Monday at a public health conference in Washington, D.C., was based on a 2008 questionnaire survey of about 10,000 students in the 8th, 10th and 12th grades in Washington. That state has the sixth largest active duty population in the country.

About 550 of surveyed children said they had a parent deployed to a combat zone in the previous six years.

The study tried to account for potential differences in educational background and other issues between military families and the general population that might skew the results.

Even after taking steps to account for such differences, the researchers found that high school-age daughters of deployed parents were nearly three times more likely than civilian girls to be in a gang or get into a fight. They were more than twice as likely to carry a weapon to school. There were similar increases among boys of deployed families when compared to civilians.

To be sure, such behavior in boys is more common — the rate of boys from deployed families involved in such violent behaviors was twice as high as for girls in deployed families. For example, 14 percent of girls from these military families said they had been in fights, compared to 28 percent of boys.

Nevertheless, experts say the findings contradict the traditional view that girls under stress exhibit "internalizing" behaviors, like becoming depressed or thinking about suicide, while boys are the ones who "externalize" through violent behavior

The new research may be something of a wake-up call for health professionals who deal with military families, one expert suggested.

"Maybe if we make assumptions about children, we may overlook other ways they may be suffering," said Dr. Gregory Gorman, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md.

Additional research is needed to confirm the findings, said Reed, who has since left the University of Washington and is now a social worker with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. For example, the survey found that 10 to 20 percent of the adolescents in deployed families said they were in gangs. That's surprisingly high — more like something seen in New York City in the 1950s. Perhaps a larger, more national study would produce a lower number.

But it's not surprising that kids in deployed families would seek out other kids to help them deal with stress, said Gregory Leskin, a UCLA psychologist who is director of a military family program at the National Child Traumatic Stress Network.

"Adolescents may be able to get lost in social networks," he said.

Copyright NBC San Diego / Associated Press